Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among American Indians and Alaska Natives
CME ACTIVITY — Volume 17 — July 16, 2020
PEER REVIEWED
A flow diagram shows results of colorectal cancer screening participation among the 3 study groups. In the group 1 usual care group, consisting of 566 participants, 36 completed a FIT test. Among 361 group 2 participants who were mailed a FIT kit, 61 completed the FIT test during the study period, and among 361 group 3 participants who were mailed a FIT kit and also received follow-up outreach if the kit was not returned within 4 weeks, 41 participants completed FIT within 4 weeks of the mailing, another 12 completed FIT during the first 4-week period of CHR outreach, another 15 completed FIT during the second 4-week period of outreach, and no additional FITs were completed during the third outreach period.
Figure 1.
Participant selection, randomization, and outcomes in 3 study groups, intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska Native people (N = 1,288) served by 3 tribally operated health care clinics, April to November, 2014. Group 1, usual care, consisted of people who either did not visit the clinic, visited the clinic and did not receive a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kit, or visited and received a FIT kit and instructions to complete at home. Group 2 participants received a FIT kit and completion instructions by mail. Group 3 participants received a mailed FIT kit and instructions, and nonrespondents received follow-up from a tribal community health representative after 4 weeks (by telephone), after 8 weeks (by home visit), and after 12 weeks by telephone. Abbreviations: CHR, community health representative; FIT, fecal immunochemical test.
Figure 2.
Percentage of participants who completed the fecal immunochemical test, by intervention group. Brackets indicate confidence intervals.
Intervention Group | % (95% CI) |
---|---|
Usual Care | 6.4 (4.6–8.7) |
Mail-out alone | 16.9 (13.4–21.1) |
Mail-out plus outreach | 18.8 (15.1–23.2) |
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.