Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
ORIGINAL RESEARCH — Volume 16 — May 2, 2019
PEER REVIEWED
Figure 1.
Percentage distribution of funding sources, by year, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014. Error bars indicate confidence intervals.
Source | % (95% Confidence Interval) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | All Years | |
Other | 7.2 (0.5–13.9) | 7.7 (2.1–13.3) | 7.5 (1.2–13.8) | 7.4 (1.2–13.6) | 3.5 (0–7.7) | 6.6 (4.0–9.2) |
In kind | 8.0 (3.5–12.5) | 8.2 (4.1–12.3) | 9.3 (4.6–14.0) | 7.4 (3.1–11.7) | 5.9 (0.7–11.1) | 7.8 (5.8–9.8) |
CDC | 84.8 (76.3–93.3) | 84.1 (76.8–91.4) | 83.2 (74.5–91.9) | 85.3 (76.6–94.0) | 90.7 (83.4–98.0) | 85.6 (82.0–89.2) |
Figure 2.
Percentage distribution of total cost by budget category, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014.
Category | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | All Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contracts, materials, and supplies | 45.7 | 37.6 | 40.0 | 36.3 | 39.3 | 39.4 |
Labor | 24.0 | 25.3 | 28.3 | 27.1 | 29.4 | 26.9 |
Screening and diagnostic services | 21.4 | 29.3 | 22.9 | 29.1 | 21.7 | 25.2 |
Administrative | 5.1 | 5.3 | 6.4 | 5.7 | 6.9 | 5.9 |
Consultants | 3.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 2.6 |
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.