PCD logo

Assessing Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit of the Trinity Hospital Twin City Fit For Life Program for Weight Loss and Diabetes Prevention in a Rural Midwestern Town

PEER REVIEWED

Figure 1.
Weight and BMI changes by primary and ancillary replication sites, Trinity Hospital Twin City FFL Program, 2013–2015. Outcomes are shown as average weight (kg) and BMI lost, with 95% confidence intervals.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FFL, Fit For Life Program.

Setting No. Average Weight Lost (95% CI), kg Average BMI Lost (95% CI)
Primary site 209 3.0 (2.5–3.5) 1.2 (0.8–1.6)
Site 1 11 1.9 (0–3.8) 1.1 (0.5–1.7)
Site 2 9 2.7 (0.8–4.6) 0.9 (0.2–1.6)
Site 3 30 2.1 (1.4–2.8) 0.8 (0.5–1.1)
Site 4 65 2.7 (1.9–3.5) 1.1 (0.7–1.5)

Return to Article

 

This figure shows changes in number of days of exercise and number of portions of fresh fruit and vegetables per week, at 4 replication sites and the diabetes prevention site combined, before the programs began and after they ended. Before the programs, 49% of participants did not exercise, 7% exercised on 1 day per week, 18% exercised on 2 days, 9% exercised on 3 days, 4% exercised on 4 days, 8% exercised on 5 days, 4% exercised on 6 days, and 1% exercised on 7 days. After the programs, 8% of participants did not exercise, 8% exercised on 1 day per week, 18% exercised on 2 days, 32% exercised on 3 days, 7% exercised on 4 days, 14% exercised on 5 days, 10% exercised on 6 days, and 2% exercised on 7 days. Before the programs, 28% of participants ate less than 1 serving of fruits or vegetables daily, 36% ate 2 servings, 17% ate 3 servings, 11% ate 4 servings, and 8% ate 5 or more servings. After the programs, 6% of participants ate less than 1 serving of fruits or vegetables daily, 18% ate 2 servings, 25% ate 3 servings, 18% ate 4 servings, and 33% ate 5 or more servings.

Figure 2.
Health behavior outcomes among replication study sites and diabetes prevention site, Trinity Hospital Twin City FFL Program, 2013–2015.

Return to Article

Top

Error processing SSI file

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.