Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to site content
CDC Home

PCD Logo

BRIEF

Cost-Effective Strategies for Rural Community Outreach, Hawaii, 2010–2011

Karen L. Pellegrin, PhD; Anna Barbato, PharmD; R. Scott Holuby, PharmD; Anita E. Ciarleglio, PhD; Ronald Taniguchi, PharmD

Suggested citation for this article: Pellegrin KL, Barbato A, Holuby RS, Ciarleglio AE, Taniguchi R. Cost-Effective Strategies for Rural Community Outreach, Hawaii, 2010–2011. Preventing Chronic Dis 2014;11:140315. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140315.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Three strategies designed to maximize attendance at educational sessions on chronic disease medication safety in older adults in rural areas were implemented sequentially and compared for cost-effectiveness: 1) existing community groups and events, 2) formal advertisement, and 3) employer-based outreach. Cost-effectiveness was measured by comparing overall cost per attendee recruited and number of attendees per event. The overall cost per attendee was substantially higher for the formal advertising strategy, which produced the lowest number of attendees per event. Leveraging existing community events and employers in rural areas was more cost-effective than formal advertisement for recruiting rural community members.

Top of Page

Objective

Medication safety is an important educational topic; adverse drug reactions in older adults are a common cause of hospital admissions, illness, and death (1,2). Adults aged 65 or older have relatively high rates of preventable adverse drug reactions because of their complex drug regimens for chronic disease and sensitivity to commonly used drugs (3,4). These factors frequently result in emergency hospitalizations of older adults (2). Group-based health education can be both effective and efficient in preventing such outcomes and may be particularly beneficial in rural areas where shortages of health care professionals are common (5,6). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of recruitment strategies designed to maximize attendance at medication safety training throughout rural communities in Hawaii.

Top of Page

Methods

This study used a quasi-experimental design to compare the cost-effectiveness of 3 recruitment strategies designed and implemented sequentially during a 14-month period of 2010–2011 to maximize attendance at education sessions focused on safety of medications commonly used to manage chronic disease. We targeted all counties in Hawaii classified as “non-metro” according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2003 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (ie, Kauai, Maui, and Hawaii counties). The target audience was older adults and their caregivers. This research was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Hawaii. The strategies are described in order of implementation.

Existing community groups and events

Key contacts with existing community groups were identified in all target counties. From July through November 2010, the education sessions were held in all 3 counties during regularly scheduled meetings or other existing events, at venues such as senior centers, neighborhood centers, churches, and community fairs. Although the sessions were typically 1 hour, a 30-minute format was used when the host specified a time limitation.

Formal advertisement

The education sessions were scheduled on weekends (1-hour format), and advertised via local media (both print and radio) before the events. The advertisements were professionally designed and produced to maximize attendance. This approach was discontinued after implementation during March 2011 in 2 of the 3 targeted counties after preliminary results indicated it was not effective.

Employer-based outreach

The human resources offices of larger employers in each of the target counties (as published in the Pacific Business News “Book of Lists”) were contacted. During July and August 2011, the educational sessions were held in all 3 counties and scheduled at times to maximize attendance, including employee breaks, shift changes, and regularly scheduled meetings of their retirees. Although the sessions were typically 1 hour, a 30-minute format was used when the host specified a time limitation.

For each strategy, the costs of outreach efforts were tracked (including staff time, consultant fees, and materials), along with attendance at each event. Relative cost-effectiveness was measured by comparing overall cost per attendee as well as number of attendees per event.

Top of Page

Results

A total of 1,002 people attended the educational sessions on medication safety for older adults throughout all 3 target counties in Hawaii. We recorded the number of attendees and calculated recruitment costs for all 3 strategies (Table). The overall cost per attendee was much higher for the formal advertising strategy than for other strategies and produced the lowest number of attendees per event. The sessions coordinated through existing community groups resulted in the highest number of attendees per event with a cost per attendee that was only slightly higher than that of the employer-based sessions.

Top of Page

Discussion

Group-based approaches can be an effective way to deliver health-related education and are often selected for their efficiency (5,6). They may be particularly beneficial in rural areas where there are shortages of health care professionals. However, there is a paucity of research on recruitment strategies for participation in group-based education. The few published studies on rural recruitment for participation in research indicate that strategies leveraging relationships and existing community resources are most effective (7–11). None of these studies compared the cost-effectiveness among the approaches. To fill this research gap, we examined the cost-effectiveness of rural recruitment strategies designed to maximize attendance at education sessions on chronic disease medication safety. Consistent with the research on rural recruitment strategies for research, recruitment approaches designed to leverage existing relationships and community resources (ie, community groups, events, and employers) were more successful than traditional advertising. In addition, the advertising approach was substantially more expensive than the other approaches.

Further research is needed because this study was a quasi-experimental design with important limitations. The program was implemented only in rural communities in Hawaii and on a focused topic, which limits the ability to generalize to other communities and content. The recruitment strategies were implemented sequentially and without experimental control groups. This design weakness introduces confounders and prevents the analysis of additive and interaction effects. For example, the formal advertisement strategy was the only strategy implemented during the spring, creating a seasonal confounder. In addition, the sequencing of the strategies may have affected the results by increasing general community awareness of the sessions over time. However, the findings are consistent with those of previous studies of rural recruitment strategies, which enhances their validity.

Further research on identification of cost-effective strategies for recruiting community members to attend educational events for chronic disease management will increase the impact of such health education programs. This study, combined with previous research, suggests that recruiting rural community members to participate in health-related educational activities — whether for prevention, treatment, or clinical research — should focus on leveraging existing social networks (eg, community groups and employers) rather than formal advertisement.

Top of Page

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant from the USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Rural Health and Safety Education Competitive Grants Program (USDA-CSREES-RHSE-002255), Medication Safety Education for Elderly in Rural Areas (award no. 2009-46100-06032). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the USDA.

Top of Page

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Karen L. Pellegrin, PhD, University of Hawaii at Hilo College of Pharmacy, 34 Rainbow Dr, Hilo, HI 96720. Telephone: 808-933-2914. E-mail: karen3@hawaii.edu.

Author Affiliations: Anna Barbato, Anita E. Ciarleglio, Ronald Taniguchi, University of Hawaii at Hilo, Hilo, Hawaii; R. Scott Holuby, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.

Top of Page

References

  1. Mannesse CK, Derkx FH, de Ridder MA, Man in ‘t Veld AJ, van der Cammen TJ. Contribution of adverse drug reactions to hospital admission of older patients. Age Ageing 2000;29(1):35–9. CrossRef PubMed
  2. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med 2011;365(21):2002–12. CrossRef PubMed
  3. Gurwitz JH, Field TS, Harrold LR, Rothschild J, Debellis K, Seger AC, et al. Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. JAMA 2003;289(9):1107–16. CrossRef PubMed
  4. Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Ruby CM, Weinberger M. Suboptimal prescribing in older inpatients and outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49(2):200–9. CrossRef PubMed
  5. Rygg LØ, Rise MB, Gronning K, Steinsbekk A. Efficacy of ongoing group based diabetes self-management education for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2012;86(1):98–105. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Zwikker HE, van den Ende CH, van Lankveld WG, den Broeder AA, van den Hoogen FH, van de Mosselaar B, et al. Effectiveness of a group-based intervention to change medication beliefs and improve medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2014;94(3):356–61. CrossRef PubMed
  7. Coleman EA, Tyll L, LaCroix AZ, Allen C, Leveille SG, Wallace JI, et al. Recruiting African-American older adults for a community-based health promotion intervention: which strategies are effective? Am J Prev Med 1997;13(6, Suppl):51–6. PubMed
  8. Gallagher-Thompson D, Solano N, Coon D, Arean P. Recruitment and retention of Latino dementia family caregivers in intervention research: issues to face, lessons to learn. Gerontologist 2003;43(1):45–51. CrossRef PubMed
  9. Levkoff S, Sanchez H. Lessons learned about minority recruitment and retention from the Centers on Minority Aging and Health Promotion. Gerontologist 2003;43(1):18–26. CrossRef PubMed
  10. Saunders SD, Greaney ML, Lees FD, Clark PG. Achieving recruitment goals through community partnerships: the SENIOR project. Fam Community Health 2003;26(3):194–202. CrossRef PubMed
  11. Burns D, Soward ACM, Skelly AH, Leeman J, Carlson J. Effective recruitment and retention strategies for older members of rural minorities. Diabetes Educ 2008;34(6):1045–52. CrossRef PubMed

Top of Page

Table

Return to your place in the textTable. Comparison of the Recruitment Strategies Implemented Sequentially in Rural Counties, Hawaii, 2010–2011
StrategyNo. of EventsTotal No. of ParticipantsTotal Recruiting Cost, $No. of Participants per EventCost per Participant, $
Community groups/events2472910,0713013.81
Formal advertisement35416,95518313.98
Employer-based outreach112192,6492012.10

Top of Page



The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.


 
For Questions About This Article Contact pcdeditor@cdc.gov
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Road Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #