About these resources
NIOSHTIC-2 is a database of occupational safety and health publications funded in whole or in part by NIOSH. These resources are meant to supplement those found on the NIOSHTIC-2 lists. See the NIOSHTIC-2 database search results for:
- Hazardous Drug Exposures in Healthcare
- Antineoplastic Agents/Chemotherapy
- NIOSH Publications on Hazardous Drugs
Additional resources regarding antineoplastic agents and research about Closed System Drug-Transfer Devices (CSTD) are also available.
Featured NIOSH publications
Publications, guidelines, review articles and surveys
Cytotoxic Drugs and Related Waste: A Risk Management Guide for South Australian Health Services.
Power LA, Polovich M. Safe handling of hazardous drugs: reviewing standards for worker protection. Pharm Pract News 2016; Special Edition:23-36.
The articles in this section, while not peer-reviewed, contain helpful “how-to” information for healthcare workers and others who work with antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs. Many provide reference material and links to additional background information.
Aguero D and Marge K. Developing a USP <800> compliance gap analysis. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(1):10–12.
Berdi F, Powell MF, Sanz C, Gonzalez R and Massoomi F. Assessing the efficiency of CSTDs for compounding. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12:4–7.
Berrios V, Smith D and Reichard JS. USP <800> compliance in outpatient infusion clinics. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(12):2–4.
Buckley B. When outsourcing IV drug preparation makes sense. Pharm Pract News. 2016; 43(7):36–38.
Buckley B. 10 Tips for building a compliant cleanroom. Pharm Pract News. 2016; 43(12):8–10.
Buckley B. USP <800> tips can be applied to home infusion. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(2):11–12.
Buckley B. On the bumpy road to USP <800> compliance: a tale of 3 hospitals. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(4):1, 26–27.
Buckley B. Pharm-entrepreneurs seek a better surface wipe. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(8):37–38.
Buckley B. USP hits pause on <800>, but no time to rest. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(11):1, 10–11.
Douglass K. Compliant garbing practices for sterile compounding. Pharm Purch Prod. 2016; 13(7):22–24.
Douglass K. Best practices for garbing in HD sterile compounding. Pharm Purch Prod. 2016; 13(11):56–64.
Douglass K. Best practices for sterile compounding. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(1):6–9.
Douglas K, Richter A, Dorey M and Rizvi I. Refining PPE usage for HD compounding: Part 1. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(2):18–21.
Eberwein SM and Amerine LB. Comparison of USP <800> gap analysis tools. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(4):12–13.
Eisenberg S. Hazardous drug handling in light of USP <800>. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12(2):18–19.
Houchard G, Lewis P, Hymel L, Prenosil S and Kisgen R. A comprehensive approach to USP <800> compliance. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(11):20–31.
Karpinski J. 2016 Updates to the NIOSH hazardous drug list. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(7):36–38.
Kastango E. 5 Reasons why USP compliance matters now. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(9):18.
Kienle P and Douglass K. Perform an assessment of risk to comply with USP <800>. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(3):26–31.
Kienle PC. Ensure USP <800> compliance beyond the pharmacy. Pharm Purch Prod. 2016; 13(9):2–4.
Kienle PC. Update on proposed USP Chapter <800>. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12(2):2–4.
Krych RJ and Lupano C. USP-compliant outpatient center renovation. Part II. Pharm Purch Prod. 2017; 14(9):18–22.
Massoomi F and Eisenberg S. Pharmacy and nursing collaborate on CSTD training. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12(5):12–16.
Massoomi F and Kvancz DA. USP <800> requirements for engineering control. Pharm Purch Prod. 2016; 13(12):16–22.
Massoomi F. The evolution of the CSTD. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12(2):S1–S12.
Rinehart JR and Jorgenson JA. Considerations for handling monoclonal antibodies. Pharm Purch Prod. 2015; 12(5):S6–S10.
Rosenthal M. CSTD buyers need advocacy help. Pharm Pract News. 2016; April 4, online issue.
Rosenthal M. Establishing procedures for testing CSTDs (Parts 1 and 2). Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(3):32–33.
Shaw G. CSTDs should be at center of health care worker safety. Pharm Pract News. 2017; 44(12):1, 18–19.
Shaw G. Do you know what's on the NIOSH HD list? Pharm Pract News. 2018; 45(1):16-17.
Wagner JT. Ensure safe use of CAIs and CACIs. Pharm Purch Prod. 2014; 11(12):12–14.
National Institutes of Health Publication. Recommendations for the Safe Handling of Cytotoxic Drugs. US DHHS PHS, NIH Pub No. 92-2621.
Süle A. Safety assessment and revision of a central cytostatic unit base on ESOP guidelines. Eur J Oncol Pharm. 2014; 8:19-23.
Several authors have published articles reviewing the topic of occupational exposure. These articles provide a good starting place for individuals not familiar with this area to learn more of what some of the issues are and what type of studies have been performed in this area.
A number of surveys have examined work practice standards and compliance with guidelines for the proper handling of hazardous drugs such as antineoplastic agents.
Effects of occupational exposure
Only a limited number of studies have examined health effects related to occupational exposure. However, for hazardous drugs such as antineoplastic agents, both acute and chronic effects have been well-documented in patients receiving treatment with these agents.
Occupational monitoring: biological studies
Several biological endpoints have been employed to monitor healthcare workers’ exposure to hazardous drugs such as antineoplastic agents. Most of these endpoints measure various types of genotoxic damage.
Deschamps F, Marinutti-Liberge and Lamiable D. Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to cytostatic drugs with platinum . Cancer Detect Prev Online.
Environmental sampling
Environmental sampling is a relatively new approach used to determine the level of workplace contamination by antineoplastic agents. The procedure has been used extensively in other situations, especially for monitoring contamination by radioactive materials. Typically, work surfaces are sampled with a moistened wipe and the material is extracted and analyzed for specific antineoplastic agents. Currently, it is possible to identify and quantitate six to eight agents with this technique.
Vazquez R, Boubet K, Guerrault-Moro MN and Crauste-Manciet S. Impact of handling errors for chemical cross-contamination risk for the preparation of parenteral cytotoxic drugs. Pharm Technol Hosp Pharm. 2016;1:115-122.