An official website of the United States government
Detecting Mpox Cases Through Wastewater Surveillance — United States, August 2022–May 2023
Weekly / January 18, 2024 / 73(2);37–43
Carly Adams, PhD1,2; Amy E. Kirby, PhD1; Megan Bias, MPH1; Aspen Riser, MPH3; Karen K. Wong, MD4; Jeffrey W. Mercante, PhD1; Heather Reese, PhD1 (View author affiliations)
View suggested citationSummary
What is already known about this topic?
CDC’s National Wastewater Surveillance System began testing wastewater for Monkeypox virus in October 2022. The performance of wastewater surveillance for detecting mpox cases is unknown.
What is added by this report?
Monkeypox virus wastewater detections were compared with reported mpox cases. Wastewater surveillance has a sensitivity of 32% for detecting a single mpox case in wastewater samples that represent thousands to millions of persons. Sensitivity increases as the number of cases in the community increases. Positive and negative predictive values are high.
What are the implications for public health practice?
An isolated Monkeypox virus wastewater detection likely warrants a limited public health response. Absence of Monkeypox virus detection in a monitored community can provide reassurance that large numbers of cases are not present. Monkeypox virus wastewater surveillance is a useful complement to mpox case surveillance.
Altmetric:
Abstract
In October 2022, CDC’s National Wastewater Surveillance System began routine testing of U.S. wastewater for Monkeypox virus. Wastewater surveillance sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for Monkeypox virus were evaluated by comparing wastewater detections (Monkeypox virus detected versus not detected) to numbers of persons with mpox in a county who were shedding virus. Case ascertainment was assumed to be complete, and persons with mpox were assumed to shed virus for 25 days after symptom onset. A total of 281 cases and 3,492 wastewater samples from 89 sites in 26 counties were included in the analysis. Wastewater surveillance in a single week, from samples representing thousands to millions of persons, had a sensitivity of 32% for detecting one or more persons shedding Monkeypox virus, 49% for detecting five or more persons shedding virus, and 77% for detecting 15 or more persons shedding virus. Weekly PPV and NPV for detecting persons shedding Monkeypox virus in a county were 62% and 80%, respectively. An absence of detections in counties with wastewater surveillance signified a high probability that a large number of cases were not present. Results can help to guide the public health response to Monkeypox virus wastewater detections. A single, isolated detection likely warrants a limited public health response. An absence of detections, in combination with no reported cases, can give public health officials greater confidence that no cases are present. Wastewater surveillance can serve as a useful complement to case surveillance for guiding the public health response to an mpox outbreak.
Introduction
The global mpox outbreak began in May 2022 when mpox began spreading widely outside countries with endemic transmission.* Persons with mpox can shed Monkeypox virus DNA in skin lesions, urine, and stool; thus, Monkeypox virus infections can be tracked through wastewater surveillance (1). In October 2022, CDC’s National Wastewater Surveillance System (NWSS),† which was established during the COVID-19 pandemic, began testing U.S. wastewater for Monkeypox virus. By May 2023, more than 500 sampling sites in 49 states were testing wastewater for Monkeypox virus.§ The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of wastewater surveillance for detecting mpox cases in the United States.
Methods
Data Sources
Sample-level NWSS wastewater data from August 2022–May 2023 (as of June 2023) were analyzed. Monkeypox virus wastewater data were reported to NWSS by a commercial contractor and an academic partner program; these entities began Monkeypox virus testing in October 2022 and June 2022, respectively¶ (2,3). Wastewater surveillance data were compared with case surveillance data** from the same period, as of July 2023. CDC mpox case definitions were used,†† and both confirmed and probable cases were included.
Data Analysis
Because of differences in reporting units for wastewater surveillance and case data, analyses were conducted by county and were restricted to counties with ≥90% population coverage by wastewater surveillance (Supplementary Figure 1, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/140513). Population coverage was determined by dividing estimated numbers of persons served by all sampling sites in a county by the county population§§ (4,5). Only dates during which all sites serving a county were collecting samples were included in the analysis. Exact dates of inclusion varied by county.¶¶ Overall, included samples were collected during August 2022–May 2023.
Persons with mpox were assumed to shed virus uniformly for 25 days from the date of symptom onset*** (1). Missing symptom onset dates (for approximately 20% of cases) were imputed by subtracting empirical median lag times (time between symptom onset and other clinical dates†††) from the earliest date available for each case (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/140513).§§§ Mpox case ascertainment was assumed to be complete, and only persons with confirmed or probable mpox were assumed to be shedding virus (6). Dichotomous county wastewater results (Monkeypox virus detection versus nondetection) were compared with the number of persons presumed to be shedding virus in the county on the sample collection date. If Monkeypox virus was detected in at least one sample from a county on a given day or week, that day or week was considered a virus detection day or week; if no Monkeypox virus was detected, that day or week was classified as a nondetection.
Sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of wastewater surveillance on a single day or week for detecting persons shedding Monkeypox virus in a county were calculated.¶¶¶ Sensitivity was defined as the probability of a wastewater detection assuming that one or more persons was shedding virus. Sensitivities for detecting varying minimum numbers of persons shedding virus were also calculated. PPV was defined as the probability that at least one person was shedding virus when a wastewater detection occurred, and NPV was defined as the probability that no persons were shedding virus in the absence of wastewater detections. The probabilities that different numbers of persons were shedding virus given the presence or absence of wastewater detections were also examined.****
Three sensitivity analyses were performed. First, the assumed shedding duration was varied from 5 to 60 days in 5-day increments. Second, the earliest date available for all cases was used, rather than imputed symptom onset dates. Third, rolling 7-day average estimates were calculated,†††† rather than weekly estimates. Analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.3; R Foundation). This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.§§§§
Results
A total of 3,492 wastewater samples from 89 sites and 26 counties (16 states) were included in the analysis (Table 1). Monkeypox virus DNA was detected in 95 samples (3%) from 17 counties (65%); 281 cases from 12 counties were included.¶¶¶¶
Sensitivity
Sensitivity of wastewater surveillance increased as the number of persons shedding Monkeypox virus increased. The probability that Monkeypox virus was detected in wastewater on a given day was 13.8% (95% CI = 10.7%–17.4%) when at least one person was shedding virus, 28.9% (95% CI = 21.9%–36.8%) when five or more persons were shedding virus, and 48.3% (95% CI = 35.2%–61.6%) when 15 or more persons were shedding virus (Table 2). When examining sensitivity during a given week, these estimates increased to 31.7% (95% CI = 23.6%–40.7%), 48.9% (95% CI = 33.7%–64.2%), and 76.5% (95% CI = 50.1%–93.2%), respectively.
Positive Predictive Value
PPV for predicting the presence of at least one person shedding Monkeypox virus in a county on a given day or week was 72.6% (95% CI = 61.8%–81.8%) and 61.9% (95% CI = 48.8%–73.9%), respectively. When virus was detected in wastewater during a given week, the probability that five or more persons were shedding virus was 34.9% (95% CI = 23.3%–48.0%) and the probability that 15 or more persons were shedding virus was 20.6% (95% CI = 11.5%–32.7%).
Negative Predictive Value
NPV for predicting the absence of any persons shedding Monkeypox virus in a county on a given day or week was 72.9% (95% CI = 70.5%–75.2%) and 80.3% (95% CI = 76.2%–84.0%), respectively. When virus was not detected in wastewater during a given week, the probability that fewer than five persons were shedding virus was 94.6% (95% CI = 92.0%–96.6%) and the probability that fewer than 15 persons were shedding virus was 99.1% (95% CI = 97.6%–99.7%).
Additional Analyses
In sensitivity analyses examining varying shedding durations, weekly sensitivity and NPV decreased and PPV increased as shedding duration increased (Figure). Daily sensitivity, NPV, and PPV followed these same trends (Supplementary Figure 2, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/140513). Results changed only slightly in other sensitivity analyses (Table 2).
Discussion
This study is the first to examine the performance of wastewater surveillance for detecting mpox cases using empirical data. Wastewater surveillance had a sensitivity of 14% on a given day for detecting the presence of at least one mpox case. However, most sites were collecting more than one sample per week. Weekly sensitivity for detecting the presence of at least one mpox case was substantially higher (32%). As the number of cases shedding virus increased, weekly sensitivity increased to 49% for detecting five or more persons and 77% for detecting 15 or more persons shedding virus. Weekly PPV and NPV were both high (62% and 80%, respectively).
Although sensitivity might seem low compared with clinical testing, each wastewater sample represents thousands to millions of persons. Results show that wastewater surveillance was sufficiently sensitive to detect even a single mpox case in these large, pooled samples. These findings contrast those for SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19), for which the minimum number of cases required for a wastewater detection is thought to be much higher (8–38 cases per 100,000 persons for detection rates at 50% and 99% probability, respectively) (7). Unlike SARS-CoV-2, high levels of Monkeypox virus are present in skin lesions as well as in urine and stool (1,8–10), and poxviruses are highly stable in the environment (9).
When Monkeypox virus was detected in wastewater on a single day or week, there was most likely (but not always) at least one case present in the county. Wastewater detections in the absence of known cases might have been the result of travelers, commuters, patients experiencing prolonged shedding, or subclinical or unreported infections (i.e., wastewater detections might have reflected true infections that had not been detected by case surveillance). Moreover, when Monkeypox virus was detected in wastewater on a single day or week, it was rare that 15 or more persons were shedding virus in the county. Because most samples were collected in fall 2022 or later, after case counts in the United States began to decline, large numbers of cases were infrequent. In addition, when Monkeypox virus was not detected in wastewater, there were most likely zero cases (and almost certainly no large numbers of cases) present in the county. High NPV can likely be partially attributed to low disease prevalence during the study period.
Limitations
The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, because data on viral shedding patterns and clinical case information were lacking,***** variations in case shedding patterns were not included. Second, persons shedding Monkeypox virus might have resided within counties included in the analysis but outside areas covered by wastewater surveillance. This limitation would bias sensitivity and PPV estimates downward and NPV estimates upward, because wastewater surveillance cannot detect persons shedding virus if they reside outside covered areas. Third, because data from all sites serving a county were combined, results could not be stratified by sampling or testing methods or site population size and thus represent average estimates of wastewater surveillance performance across sites and time. Fourth, because case counts during the study period were low, estimates for detecting large numbers of cases are highly uncertain. Finally, although mpox is a nationally notifiable disease in the United States and all cases should be reported, and studies suggest that most cases are diagnosed, some cases might remain unreported (6).
Implications for Public Health Practice
The findings in this report can help guide the public health response to Monkeypox virus wastewater detections. Because wastewater surveillance is sufficiently sensitive to detect very few mpox cases, a single, isolated wastewater detection might not warrant a large public health response. Moreover, because most wastewater detections during the study period resulted from five or fewer cases, the public health response to a single wastewater detection might be scaled to one recommended for small case numbers, as long as mpox case counts remain low. Finally, nondetection of Monkeypox virus in wastewater, in combination with no reported cases, can provide reassurance to public health officials that large numbers of cases are not present in communities where wastewater surveillance is occurring. Wastewater surveillance for Monkeypox virus has a sensitivity of 32% for detecting a single case, with sensitivity increasing to 49% and 77% for detecting five or more and 15 or more cases, respectively. PPV and NPV for Monkeypox virus wastewater surveillance are high (62% and 80%, respectively). Wastewater surveillance can be a useful complement to case surveillance for guiding the mpox outbreak response.
Corresponding author: Carly Adams, cadams3@cdc.gov.
1Division of Infectious Disease Readiness and Innovation, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 2Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 3Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC; 4National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Office of the Director, CDC.
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
* https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/response/2022/index.html
† https://www.cdc.gov/nwss/wastewater-surveillance.html
§ https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/cases-data/wastewater-surveillance.html
¶ NWSS’s commercial contractor began testing wastewater for Monkeypox virus in October 2022; it tested raw wastewater using quantitative polymerase chain reaction against a nonvariola Orthopoxvirus target that enables detection of both Monkeypox virus Clade I and Clade II. Detections were defined as samples with average concentrations >0 copies per liter. The academic partner program began testing wastewater for Monkeypox virus in July 2022; the program tested settled wastewater solid and primary sludge using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. During July–December 2022, the program tested samples against a generic mpox target that enables detection of both Monkeypox virus Clade I and Clade II; a subset of samples was also tested using an assay specific to Clade II. In December 2022, generic mpox testing was discontinued, and all samples were tested with the Clade II assay. Detections were defined as samples with average concentrations >1,100 copies per gram.
** Jurisdictions reported case-level data to CDC electronically via a standardized case report form or the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (NNDSS). County of residence was reported for cases.
†† https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/mpox/clinicians/case-definition.html
§§ 2022 U.S. Census Bureau and 2021 State Health Department data (when U.S. Census Bureau estimates were not available by county) were used for county population estimates.
¶¶ Earliest county inclusion dates were the maximum of minimum sample collection dates for all county sites (minus 6 days to account for sampling on different days of the week). Last inclusion dates were the minimum of maximum sample collection dates for all county sites (plus 6 days) or May 7, 2023 (1 month before data download), whichever date was earliest. For duplicate sites (collecting samples for two sources), dates were included if at least one source was collecting samples.
*** Twenty-five days is the median time from illness onset to viral clearance in skin lesion samples, the sample type with the longest clearance time and highest viral load.
††† Other clinical dates included diagnosis date, date first reported to a public health department, first positive mpox test result date, rash onset date, case investigation start date, CDC case report date, and hospital admission date.
§§§ Median lag times from symptom onset date were calculated from the full case data set (30,026 cases). Negative lag times and implausible dates were excluded from calculations. In the study data set, symptom onset date was changed to rash onset date if rash onset was earlier (four cases). The earliest date available for most cases (60%) with missing symptom onset date (59 cases) was diagnosis date (median lag time = 6 days).
¶¶¶ Sensitivity = true positive (TP) / TP + false negative (FN); PPV = TP / TP + false positive (FP); NPV = true negative (TN) / TN + FN. TPs and FNs were defined as days or weeks with wastewater detections and no detections, respectively, and cases shedding. TNs and FPs were defined as days or weeks with no detections and detections, respectively, and no cases shedding. CIs were calculated using exact binomial tests. Specificity was not included because of limited utility in this context.
**** Equations for sensitivity, PPV, and NPV were used for calculations; however, the definitions of TPs, FNs, FPs, and FNs were changed. TPs and FNs were defined as days or weeks with wastewater detections and no detections, respectively, and at least a specified number of cases shedding. TNs and FPs were defined as days or weeks with no detections and detections, respectively, and less than a specified number of cases shedding. For example, FPs for detecting five or more cases were days or weeks with wastewater detections and fewer than five cases shedding.
†††† For each day in a given county, samples collected on that day and within 3 days earlier or later were included. If Monkeypox virus was detected in any of the samples, that day’s 7-day period was considered a detection, and otherwise it was considered a nondetection. Wastewater results were compared with the average number of cases shedding over the 7-day period.
§§§§ 45 C.F.R. part 46; 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d), 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a, 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.
¶¶¶¶ Cases were included in the analysis if they shed Monkeypox virus during dates of inclusion for county of residence; 281 cases were included in the main analysis (assuming 25 days of shedding). The number of cases included in all analyses ranged from 203 (assuming 5 days of shedding) to 632 (assuming 60 days of shedding).
***** Information on case characteristics, including immunosuppressing conditions and vaccination status, was frequently missing (≥60% of cases) or absent from the data set.
References
- Suñer C, Ubals M, Tarín-Vicente EJ, et al.; Movie Group. Viral dynamics in patients with monkeypox infection: a prospective cohort study in Spain. Lancet Infect Dis 2023;23:445–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00794-0 PMID:36521505
- Acer P, Imakaev M, Stansifer K, Tsui C. Limit of detection for Biobot Analytics’s E9L-NVAR orthopoxvirus assay in a wastewater context. Cambridge, MA: Biobot Analytics; 2023. https://biobot.io/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/BIOBOT_WHITEPAPER_MPXV_ASSAY_LOD_V01-1.pdf
- Wolfe MK, Yu AT, Duong D, et al. Wastewater surveillance for Monkeypox virus in nine California communities. medRxiv [Preprint posted online September 9, 2022]. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.06.22279312v1 https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.06.22279312
- U.S. Census Bureau. County population totals and components of change: 2020–2022. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau; 2023. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-counties-total.html#v2022
- Connecticut State Department of Public Health. Annual town and county population for Connecticut. Hartford, Connecticut: Connecticut State Department of Public Health; 2023. https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems–Reporting/Population/Annual-Town-and-County-Population-for-Connecticut
- Ogale YP, Baird N, Townsend MB, et al.; DC Mpox Response Project Team. Evidence of mpox virus infection among persons without characteristic lesions or rash presenting for first dose of JYNNEOS vaccine—District of Columbia, August 2022. Clin Infect Dis 2023;77:298–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad145 PMID:36916132
- Li Q, Lee BE, Gao T, et al. Number of COVID-19 cases required in a population to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater in the province of Alberta, Canada: sensitivity assessment. J Environ Sci (China) 2023;125:843–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.04.047 PMID:36375966
- Lim CK, McKenzie C, Deerain J, et al. Correlation between monkeypox viral load and infectious virus in clinical specimens. J Clin Virol 2023;161:105421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105421 PMID:36893717
- Atoui A, Jourdain F, Mouly D, Cordevant C, Chesnot T, Gassilloud B. A review on mpox (monkeypox) virus shedding in wastewater and its persistence evaluation in environmental samples. Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 2023;7:100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2023.100315
- Palich R, Burrel S, Monsel G, et al. Viral loads in clinical samples of men with monkeypox virus infection: a French case series. Lancet Infect Dis 2023;23:74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00586-2 PMID:36183707
Abbreviation: MPXV = Monkeypox virus.
* Twenty-six counties that had ≥90% population coverage by wastewater sampling sites testing for MPXV were included in the analysis.
† County numbers were arbitrarily assigned.
§ County population estimates were obtained from 2022 U.S. Census Bureau population estimates or 2021 state health department population estimates where U.S. Census Bureau estimates by county were not available.
¶ Numbers of persons with mpox included in the main analysis (assuming persons with mpox shed virus from the date of symptom onset until 25 days later) are shown. This number includes persons with mpox with symptom onset dates (reported or imputed) within 25 days before the first study inclusion date through the last study inclusion date for the county of residence.
** Date ranges include dates during which all sites in a county were collecting wastewater samples for MPXV testing. Samples from a county were included in the analysis if they were collected within the county’s data range. The earliest inclusion date per county was the maximum of the minimum sample collection dates for all sites in the county (minus 6 days to account for sampling on different days of the week). The last inclusion date per county was the minimum of the maximum sample collection dates for all sites in the county (plus 6 days), or May 7, 2023, (1 month before data download), whichever date was earliest. For duplicate sites (sites collecting samples for two different sources), dates were eligible for inclusion if at least one source was collecting samples on that date.
Abbreviations: MPXV = Monkeypox virus; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.
* Probabilities for N persons with mpox shedding MPXV when MPXV was and was not detected in wastewater were also calculated.
† Wastewater results were combined for all sites serving a county; if at least one site serving a county detected MPXV in wastewater on a given sample collection day, that day was considered a detection for that county, and otherwise a nondetection.
§ Persons with reported mpox were assumed to shed MPXV in their county of residence from the day of symptom onset until 25 days later. The number of persons with mpox shedding MPXV were summed to determine the number of persons with mpox shedding MPXV on each day in a given county.
¶ Wastewater results for a given sample collection day were compared with the minimum numbers of persons with mpox shedding virus on that day in a given county.
** Wastewater results were combined by calendar week; if at least one site serving a county detected MPXV in wastewater in a given sample collection week, that week was considered a detection for that county, and otherwise a nondetection. Wastewater results for a given sample collection week were compared with the average minimum numbers of persons with mpox shedding virus that week in a given county. Estimates for larger numbers of persons with mpox shedding virus are missing because cell counts when examining data by week were small.
†† The main analysis used the date of symptom onset (imputed and not imputed) for all calculations.
§§ This sensitivity analysis used the earliest date available for persons with mpox for all calculations. Imputed symptom onset dates were not used.
¶¶ This sensitivity analysis examined weekly results by a 7-day rolling average, rather than by calendar week. For each sample collection day, the sample collection day, 3 days before, and 3 days after was examined. If at least one site serving the county detected MPXV in wastewater during those 7 days, that sample was considered a detection, and otherwise, it was considered a nondetection. Wastewater results were compared with the average minimum numbers of persons with mpox shedding MPXV in the county during those 7 days.
FIGURE. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value* of wastewater surveillance† for detecting persons shedding Monkeypox virus§ in a county in a week¶ for different assumed shedding durations** — United States, August 2022–May 2023
Abbreviations: MPXV = Monkeypox virus; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.
* Sensitivity is the probability that MPXV was detected in wastewater when at least one person with mpox were shedding MPXV. PPV was defined as the probability that at least one person was shedding virus when a wastewater detection occurred. NPV was defined as the probability that no persons were shedding virus in the absence of wastewater detections. Probabilities for specific numbers of persons with mpox shedding MPXV when MPXV was and was not detected in wastewater are also shown.
† Wastewater test results were combined for all sites serving a county: if at least one site serving a county detected MPXV in wastewater in a given sample collection week, that week was considered a detection for that county, and otherwise a nondetection.
§ Persons with reported mpox were assumed to shed MPXV in their county of residence from the day of symptom onset until 25 days later. The number of persons with mpox shedding MPXV were summed to determine the number of persons with mpox shedding MPXV on each day in a given county.
¶ Wastewater test results for a given sample collection week were compared to the average numbers of mpox cases shedding MPXV in that week in a given county.
** The assumed shedding duration was varied from 5 to 60 days in 5-day increments. Main results are shown with an assumed shedding duration of 25 days with 95% CIs. CIs were calculated using exact binomial tests.
Suggested citation for this article: Adams C, Kirby AE, Bias M, et al. Detecting Mpox Cases Through Wastewater Surveillance — United States, August 2022–May 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024;73:37–43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7302a3.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of
the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.